Posts Tagged ‘federal legislation’

Zubulake Revisited? Dissecting the Pension Committee vs Banc of America Opinion

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

When: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 1 p.m EST
Where: Webinar

THE SEDONA CONFERENCE® “VOICES FROM THE DESERT” WEBINAR SERIES PRESENTS “ZUBULAKE REVISITED? DISSECTING THE PENSION COMMITTEE V. BANC OF AMERICA OPINION” – WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2010 AT 1:00 PM EASTERN

The first major judicial opinion on e-discovery for 2010 was delivered by a judge who was already a distinguished jurist in the field and it harkened back to a landmark decision from the past. The January 15 Amended Opinion and Order in Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan, et al. v. Banc of America Securities, LLC, et al. was titled “Zubulake Revisited: Six Years Later [pdf]” by its author, Hon. Shira A. Scheindlin of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, who stated, “Once again, I have been compelled to closely review the discovery efforts of parties in a litigation, and once again have found that these efforts were flawed. As famously noted, ‘[t]hose who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.’”

Pension Committee details the data preservation efforts of 13 plaintiff investors who joined an action to recover an alleged half-billion dollars in losses from the liquidation of two British Virgin Islands-based hedge funds. More to the point, the opinion details the lack of preservation efforts by the plaintiffs, finding that seven of the plaintiffs acted negligently and six of the plaintiffs acted with gross negligence, resulting in the probable loss or destruction of relevant data, and requiring further discovery, monetary sanctions, and a carefully-crafted spoliation instruction to the jury. In her lengthy opinion [pdf], Judge Scheindlin discusses the duty of preservation and what it requires of parties, distinguishes between the various levels of culpability in the plaintiffs’ conduct, explores the shifting burdens of proof in spoliation claims, and sets out the appropriate remedies for the failure to preserve electronically stored information in litigation.

In this webinar, our distinguished panel will take a careful look at the Pension Committee opinion and what it teaches all of us – plaintiffs, defendants, and the Judiciary – about the duty of preservation and the sanctions for spoliation. The panel will be moderated by Ken Withers (Director of Judicial Education and Content, The Sedona Conference®) and will include Hon. Elizabeth Laporte (United States Magistrate Judge in the Northern District of California) attorneys Jonathan Redgrave (Nixon Peabody LLP) and Jennifer Young (Milberg LLP), and veteran e-discovery technical expert John Jessen (Datacon/Electronic Evidence Discovery).

TO REGISTER and for more details, please go to our WGS Audio Update Series homepage. The registration fee for this program is only $99 for the general public and $79 for members of The Sedona Conference® Working Group Series.

Once registered, you will be able to listen to the discussion by telephone, view PowerPoint slides, download selected program materials, and ask questions during a question-and-comment period.

1.25 HOUR OF MCLE ACCREDITATION will be applied for in the following jurisdictions:

California
Georgia
Illinois
Indiana
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Nevada
Tennessee
Texas
Wisconsin

Each person who wants to receive MCLE credit must register and participate INDIVIDUALLY. Group or location registration will not be recognized for MCLE credit.

Follow this link for more information about the ruling
ou bien en français
.

Canadian Privacy Law: The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA)

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009

Do you have a subscription yet to the The International In-house Counsel Journal, published in print four-times a year and available on-line to subscribers? An article entitled, “Canadian Privacy Law: The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA)” by Dominic Jaar, Legal Counsel, Ledjit Consulting, Inc., Canada appeared in a recent edition of the esteemed international publication. Mr. Jaar, Esq. writes:

“PIPEDA is the federal legislative response to growing concerns over the protection and use of personal information that is accumulated by both public and private organizations in the course of their day-to-day operations. The Act sets out rules governing how such information should be handled by the organizations that collect it, and under what circumstances it may be disclosed, either to third parties or to the individual who is the subject of the information… The enactment of PIPEDA was motivated not only by the government’s concern with privacy issues within its borders, but also by privacy developments taking place in other countries with whom Canadians do business.”

You’re welcome to read the entire article on-line (for those already subscribed to the IICJ) by clinking on one of the following links:

If using a Mozilla Firefox browser, click here for a direct link to the abstract.
If using Internet Explorer or another browser, click here; then enter “jaar” in the author field.

Follow this link to subscribe:

Here’s what others are saying about the International In-house Counsel Journal:

“The IICJ is a peer-reviewed legal periodical published in over 100 countries. Reading it is a great way to stay informed on current legal issues that impact the world.” – Bart Bevers, Inspector General, Health & Human Svc Commission, USA

“The IICJ is an excellent and informative publication, covering a breadth of topics. I am delighted to be both contributor and subscriber.” - Jeremy Evans, In-house Counsel, Streamserve, UK

“It is enlightening to read the experiences and opinions of my peers. In general, the IIC Journal is thought provoking, authoritative and up to date.” – Alice Selby, Senior Regulatory Counsel, T-Mobile, Czech Republic

“IICJ provides a forum for concise and clear views with attention to the issues corporate counsel are focused on.” - Karl Hennessee, Vice-President Litigation & Regulatory Affairs, Airbus SAS, France